1. Too many NGOs are fragmented and trapped in project work; they are often human-rights-blind and mainly service oriented; many are caught up in sustaining themselves financially.
  1. Service-oriented NGOs will find it more difficult to alter or change power relations –a must for a Human Rights-based approach.
  1. too many NGOs are not looking (or have ceased to look) holistically despite the fact that they have much knowledge of what is going on; but they are not acting on that knowledge to really serve the people they work with. (Lawrence Haddad) They need to speak up on how they interpret what they see.
  1. So, here are some ‘take-home-messages’ for NGOs who are ready to assume their due role in the struggle for Human Rights:
  1. In a participatory process, NGOs need to refocus their respective visions and restructure their plans in the light of Globalization and the specific historical context of each country.
  1. This entails retraining their staff in the new vision and sharing the vision with their respective constituencies for feedback.
  1. They need to network with other like-minded NGOs to join forces to courageously advocate and denounce donor agencies and governments not upholding Human Rights.
  1. They also need to change their organizational structure and internal systems as needed to adopt a Human Rights-based approach, as well as tos  et up an ad-hoc internal task force that focuses on macro and Human Rights issues.
  1. On the other hand, communities need greater control over NGO staff’s activities; this is what has been called ‘localized accountability’.
  1. So, to get out of a state of lethargy in this domain, NGOs need to amass a fair dose of creative anger.
  1. Involving their respective constituencies (global, regional, national and local), each NGO should ask itself:
  1. What problems are we dealing with now? To what extent are they related to Human Rights?
  2. What information about rights violations do we already have? What information do we still need to research more on? How are we using this knowledge?
  3. What actions are we now involved in? Are we addressing/minimizing/preventing Human Rights problems? Are we altogether “off-track” as relates to the Human Rights problems?
  1. If we are currently not addressing the Human Rights problems, what structures would we need to address them?
  1. What organizational restructuring will we need? within our own NGO? and in our work to expand the Human Rights actors’ network nationally?
  1. Who is responsible to make these changes: we, as an individual NGO, or a national network of NGOs?
  1. There is ‘big-league’ and ‘small-league’ advocacy NGOs have to get involved in. In advocacy work, in order to avoid spreading themselves too thin, NGOs ought to concentrate on a few major (core) issues and on issues specifically pertaining to each of them. (Do not loose focus by covering all macro issues…and do share your success stories…).
  1. Given the challenges ahead, the Human Rights agenda of NGOs cannot be apolitical; the name of the game is actually being politically smart in furthering Human Rights goals.
  1. Knowing about injustice does not move many; becoming-conscious about it generates a creative anger that calls for involvement in corrective measures. That is why being socially-responsible is but a euphemism for what should really be called political-responsibility. Political commitment is important, precisely because governments function as political entities. Political forces are thus fought with political actions, not with morals or technical fixes. It is precisely a misunderstanding of reality (or a partial understanding of it) that often reinforces an apolitical position of some NGOs.
  1. One national NGO should act as an umbrella Human Rights organization, i.e., to be a broker of information to its members, helping them interpret it and challenging them to use the information to their advantage; this by itself fosters activism –giving other NGOs some novel ideas on how to do new things in their Human Rights work. The umbrella organization thus becomes a catalyst and an alter-ego (the consciousness) of its members and brings all members to a common ground by setting up either lose or militant networks (even if heterogeneous otherwise, but united on Human Rights goals) in which the relationship is based on a shared vision and political outlook on Human Rights issues.
  1. Bottom line: NGOs ought to put their right hand over their hearts and face the sometimes painful truth: You DO know where you stand and DO know on whose side you are acting.

Claudio Schuftan, Ho Chi Minh City

Schuftan@gmail.com

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *